FAQ: Industrial Track or Main Track?
Are there two different types of paper submission for KDD-2001?
Yes. There are "main track" paper submissions and "industry track"
submissions.
Is my paper appropriate as a main track submission?
Main track submissions are expected to make a significant, novel
contribution to the science. We want to be clear that we urge both
authors and reviewers to consider a broad range of potential
contributions. For example, main track submissions may define new
research problems, new problem classes, new methodologies, etc.
Application papers are appropriate if they contribute to the
science.
What does it mean for an applications paper to contribute to
the science?
There are many different ways of contributing. For example, an
applications paper can demonstrate to researchers that it is important
to consider weakening an assumption they make routinely. The
important thing is for authors to state clearly (i) the contribution
of the paper, and (ii) how the paper supports the contribution--so
that the reviewers can evaluate it. Note that if you (as an author)
don't state your contribution clearly, reviewers will have to infer
what you intend--often incorrectly.
More on the potential contributions of applications papers and
applied research can be found here:
http://www.stern.nyu.edu/~fprovost/home.html#applications
Is my paper appropriate as an industry track submission?
Industrial track papers are judged primarily based on their commercial
or "real world" usefulness. How interested will people (in industry
and hopefully in academia) be in reading the paper? IT papers are not
expected to contribute to the science, necessarily. Rather, they
should serve as a bridge between researchers and industry. For
example, an industry-track paper may allow practitioners to call for
action by the research community, without the stringent requirements
of a research-track paper.
Examples of papers suitable for the IT track include
- exciting real-world success stories, especially those that might be
useful to others in similar domains.
- real-world failure stories (that teach good lessons, of course)
- objective evaluations of commercial products
- explanations of the design choices made by existing products or projects.